BimTAKE on Retail
The official Retail student blog of Birla Institute of Management Technology (BIMTECH), Greater Noida.
Wednesday, 17 October 2012
The west will wait....
The capitalistic economic model sustained for so long has been based on growth and rising demand. An expectation the slowing growth rate of the west has not been able to sustain. This model of investment by taking up huge credit in order to grow requires that companies need to keep growing at a certain rate or they will implode. Be it growth in terms of GDP, population growth or growth in consumer demand, the developed world has reached a saturation point. The economic crisis we see today are just manifestations of this saturation. Manufacturers need to produce more, retailers need to sell more, banks need to invest more. But where will the demand, the raw materials and the labor required come from? The developing world can provide all this and more. But unlike the earlier centuries the west can no longer grab what they want by sheer force, they will have to participate in the development.
To the west India and China represent opportunities to keep their domestic population satisfied by giving them opportunities to grow. The sheer numbers in terms of potential purchasing power that these two economies together have is what drags them to us. That is why even though domestic incomes are dropping and unemployment is rising, multinationals are encouraged to invest in India and invest heavily. Companies know that if they can successfully leverage their international experience while at the same time adjust to local conditions India and China can rescue them from stagnation or even decline in their home markets.
Every sector in the country is in a nascent stage with potential for new entrants and ideas. While there are latent inadequacies in Indian infrastructure and decision making processes, the gradual opening up of the economy has given foreign companies time to study the market and the Indian customer. The young, upwardly mobile population ensures a market receptive to new ideas and brands. Unlike China, India has a stable political and social structure and have democratic institutions similar to the west. Thus engaging India makes not only economic sense but also strategic sense. The Chinese economy might be attractive for its size and efficiency but come inherent with risk. The Chinese model of huge investments in infrastructure and a controlled currency is untested and is considered unsustainable by many leading economists. India meanwhile follows a tried and tested model of organic growth both in infrastructure and in supply-demand growth.
If the Indian government can ensure continuity and consistency in reforms, there will always be companies willing to invest in Indian no matter how slow or regulated the reform process is. India represents a long term strategic investment to them. Thus it remains imperative that we take a slow and steady path to opening up the economy ensuring growth without effecting local industries. The opportunities globalization and the world economic system has thrown at us need to be utilized to solve our internal deficiencies. Corruption and infrastructure bottlenecks will have to be addressed.
They need us more than we need them. Something we would do well not to forget.
Saturday, 6 October 2012
BAND BAAJA BUSINESS!
Wednesday, 3 October 2012
GADGET-ONOMICS!!
Apple iPhone 5 – “The Best thing to happen to iPhone after iPhone” is the latest buzz word. It is lighter & thinner with a 4-inch retina display, ultrafast wireless, A6 chip, iSight camera with panorama views and iOS 6 as operating system. Though Apple has replaced Google's map application - the mapping gold standard - with its own, vastly inferior, application, which has infuriated its customers. Also some complaints have been flowing in, but that is the part and parcel of the game or as they say “Glitches happen”. Yet, this newer and sleeker version is to die for!!
- iCloud cloud service
- Twitter integration - MP4/MP3/WAV/AAC player - Photo viewer/editor - Audio&video player/editor - iBooks PDF reader - Google Maps - TV-out |
Monday, 1 October 2012
The politics of retail
The Indian government is today a minority. It's one major ally short of a simple majority in parliament. Two years into it's term, it didn't take any huge scandal or crisis to make this happen, though there were no shortage of both, but just allowing FDI in organized retail. How the times have changed.
True, retail is an indispensable part of civil society and accounts for 11% of our GDP but it has never been a part of any five year plan or government scheme. With 95% in the unorganised sector, retail has been growing happily without any government intervention. If there is demand, whatever it might be for, there's will be someone ready to sell it for a profit. Retail as an institution is easily far older than governments themselves.
When big Indian corporations came out with organized retail chains, there were but whimpers of protests. When full FDI was allowed in the back end, it barely made the papers. Why now this hue and cry against foreign investment.
Let us consider the various stakeholders involved one by one, the farmer, the shopkeeper, the retail employee, the customer, the country and the politician. Let us try to remove the hype created by the media and other political instruments and concentrate purely on the normal man's understanding of what is going on around him.
The common small farmer lives in a very micro level society. Tell any farmer in India about any government initiative and his initial questioning will be limited to four basic questions. Will I lose my land? Will I get more money for my produce? Will I get loans easily? Will I be able to work less? A positive answer to these questions and the farmer and family are happy. FDI as such will not be able to bring any change that Indian retailers haven't had the opportunity to provide. The farmer really doesn't care if it's an Indian or a foreign company. Why should he?
The shopkeepers are the ones the media portray as the biggest losers. But are they themselves so worried? A normal kirana owner has the pulse of his customers. He has with him the best of CRM techniques in person to person interaction which no large retailer can compete with. He understands that his share of the pie is large and growing enough to sustain him. While the big players cater to the top 20-25 percent of the income pyramid, he is the owner of rest of it. While his customers might grow up to visit the nearest Big Bazaar, there are enough growing up from below to sustain his shop. McDonalds hasn't exactly destroyed the local tikki-waala has it. Growing congestion and rising real estate prices have already taken the rich metro customers out of his reach. It's again the politician and the trade unions that are doing his worrying for him.
The employee is happy. The unemployment is growing and the job market is not keeping pace. Any new job opportunities are welcomed with open arms. The country has too many young skilled and semi-skilled laborers to sustain everyday. Foreign players are looked upon as saviors providing better pay and better working conditions. But considering the track record of major retailers like WalMart, they may be in for a shock. Under more liberal labor laws, retailers are notorious in the west for their treatment of employees. Expecting them to do any better here would be foolish.
The customer is ecstatic. Rising competition and rising assortments can only lead to cheaper products and more variety. The monthly grocery purchase now entails more than one option while products all over the world are available through multiple channels. Retailers are beginning to get more customers centric and customer satisfaction and retention are the new buzzwords. Foreign retailers used to serving highly demanding customers will surely bring something new to the table. The customer will remain the king.
The country really needs the confidence of investors. Terrible fiscal management and growing infrastructure needs has left the economy in dire need of foreign capital. FDI will increase FIIs boosting up the stock market as well as bringing much needed investment in infrastructure. More competition and efficient practices might drive down inflation giving the RBI more freedom to control our growing current account deficit. As the Kelkar report has put so explicitly, growth is no longer an achievement, it is a necessity our country needs to not collapse on the weight of its growing population. FDI across the board in all sectors previously protected is the need of the hour. We have a huge market. Now is the time to leverage it to fulfill the potential our country holds.
Last and unfortunately not the least are our politicians, the policy makers. The ones supporting FDI as well as the ones opposing it seem to have similar reasons and similar arguments. In the game of politics it is easy to take a stand or raise one's swords on issues whose gestation periods are long and the benefits or losses immeasurable. Thus corruption or price hikes get sidetracked as they might fall prey to immediate action which no politician wants. FDI will be seen as a boon or a bane depending on which side of parliament you sit while larger issues can be swept under the carpet across the board. Sufficient loopholes have been kept for manipulations and the numbers game in parliament has got a safe issue to hedge its bets on. What else do politicians want.
Thus neither is FDI in retail going to usher in any golden age in the country nor will it cause any catastrophic collapse. But as long as it makes economic sense, it could benefit the population. Whatever be the end result, the politicians rest smug in the knowledge that the Indian will move on and survive come what may.


.jpg)






.jpg)
