Zara,
the flagship company of Inditex Group based in Spain has the famed story of
successfully replicating the hot trends of the fashion industry and reaching
the wardrobes of its customers in just 15 days. It is not an innovator which
believes in creating fashion rather it is an early adopters. It prides itself
in manufacturing 11,000 distinct SKU’s annually in about 4-5 weeks against the
industry average of 6 months and bravely discontinuing it, if it fails to become
the “HOT SELLING ITEM” in the pilot week.
“Government rejects Zara’s holding position in
single brand retail” screamed a national
daily, which stated the Indian government rejecting its proposal to set up a
joint venture company holding 51% stake with foreign equity participation for
single-brand retail trading of Massimo Dutti brand which incidentally is a subsidiary
of the Inditex group. The reason given was the violation of a rule framed by
the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) under which an
investor must own the brand it proposes to bring to India.
The
news is surely giving sleepless nights to not only Zara officials, but also
IKEA’s top management which is all buckled up to inject 10,500 crores INR in
“Third world” countries like India. Can this mayhem be blamed on blurred
policies of the Indian government, not only concerning FDI norms but multi
layered taxes and nuclear policies as well? In the 2012 Union Budget, Pranab
Mukherjee stated that foreign single brand and multi brand retailers have to
source 30% and 75% respectively of their goods locally. But the Foreign Investment
Promotion Board (FIPB) fails to realise that it is the policies of these
globally renowned companies which have made them efficient. Zara buys its
fabric in advance in prediction of forecasting trends. Much of its fabric is in
greige form which is printed or colored to the desired effect, as when it’s
needed. In a country where the lead time for the fabric to reach its factories
is 30-60 days, it takes another 10-30 days to create the desired garment which
would ultimately defeat Zara’s 15 day theory. Again, it has quality standards to
adhere to for which Zara has a vertically integrated organisational structure.
The
Indian government should clearly convey to these foreign companies that they
have to change their vision, mission and corporate strategies to suit the
Indian scenarios if it cannot change or clarify the policies it comes up with.
But there is still a flicker of hope that Zara can convince the Indian
government to bend its policies and continue to stick to its image of “THE
TREND SETTER”.
The
world retail industry is counting on it.

India needs to change its policies both to felicitate fdi that can lower both deficit & RS value & keep pace with fast changing world where every other country is trying to out show other to remain an attractive destination(our admirers & references China,Singapore..) for investment.For brands as Inditex-owned Massimo Dutti, it is not easy to change the ownership structure because of their large global presence thus creating block for their investment.As far as IKEA is concerned govt is creating nightmares for them by forcing them to source 30% from MSME(less than 5 million investment).GOVT need to undersatnd when any MSME will try to supply IKEA it would have to increase investment thus going out of MSME definition & IKEA losing its supplier.Time is running out like bolt for govt to act to bring 1 billion plus fdi in retail by IKEA.
ReplyDelete