They come, conquer, make you dance to their tunes and take your
buck away! It was 64 years back we got our freedom and now when soothsayers
point towards the dark skies in times of slowdown foreign money through FDI in
multi brand is a scapegoat to revive the economy. But whether its true is hard
to tell. The monopolistic buying power of the
large retailers would weaken the marginal farmers' position, resulting in lower
share of value to them, dictating of the production techniques and output by
the larger retailers and destruction of diversity in Indian agriculture. The idea that the farmer will get a
better price for his produce if FDI in Retail is allowed is not holistic. The
open market does not work on altruism and social service. It negotiates the
best for itself so it can corner the most for itself. Farmer suicides are not
because they cannot sell, but because they are unable to get remunerative
prices for their produce owing to inefficiencies in the value and supply chain,
traditional buying and selling techniques in mandis, lack of proper crop
management and large number of intermediaries.
Big retailers and food processors alter crop selection to have farmers
produce at their discretion and not by will. Corporates would not like to
mingle with small and medium farmers because they are at a position of
advantage and would strike contracts with a few big farmers thereby making the
small ones succumb. FDI in retail would help only those farmers who collaborate
with multinationals and accept their conditions, meaning they begin growing
only those crops decided upon by their collaborators. In the West corporate
retailers control the entire supply chain of food and farmers have no place to
sell other than to select corporations. Initially the farmers will be paid as per their
demand for their produce by the MNCs. Once the traders are gone, the farmers
will be forced to sell at rates dictated to them. Retailers would push the farming community towards growing genetically
modified seeds with extensive use of pesticides and chemicals which would
impact land fertility intensively.
There is already 100 per cent FDI in the
agriculture sector which doesn’t seem to have done any good. There is a vast scope
of cold chains to be built and better post harvest techniques to be deployed.
If Adani could invest in setting up C.A (Controlled Atmosphere) stores why
can’t the so called philanthropists of India Inc. do so? Or are they freezing
their money in Switzerland.
The focus should be on revamping the mandis
infrastructure and using modern techniques so that the largest chunk of the
consumer rupee goes to the farmer and in turn consumers pay lesser price for
the commodity they purchase. E-farm is a small start-up which has made use of
the best logistic and reverse-logistic practices along with modern sourcing and
proper crop forecasting techniques which in turn would help to keep a tab on
inflation. Such practices are essential in modernising the agriculture sector.
Corporate don’t
source from small farmers but carry out contract farming or approach large
farmers. Small and medium farmers till this date approach the traditional
system of mandis, retailers and HoReCa source from this channel mostly. The gap
between demand and supply today is created by the middlemen by initially paying
a higher price when the crop season begins and when the season is at its peak,
the middlemen make the excuse of compensating for their losses by reducing the
prices and the irony is that consumer is paying the same amount of money. What is
threatening is the reduction in the number of options the farmer is left with
to sell his/her crop. Foreign retailers
would replicate the same practices initially by wiping out the middlemen, then
the small retailers and finally the street hawkers. Eventually cartels would be
formed by foreign retailers and prices would also be determined by them. Amul,
the successful story of India’s dairy farming opposes FDI and Mr. Sodhi GCMMF’s
Managing Director says “Farmers
get the least returns from the modern trade and the so called efficiency
benefits only the large retailers as they constantly drive down the prices” also integration with global retail chains, which operate across the
world, will directly expose Indian consumers as well as Indian farmers to any
future global turbulence.
*The views expressed
in this article are personal and no organization, institution and individual with
which the author is associated should be held responsible for this article. The
author hails from a farming background and has seen and studied the agriculture/horticulture
sector closely.

Lets do some reality check
ReplyDeleteIndia largest producer of milk ,second largest producer of Rice,fruits,vegetables,third largest producer of food grain &fish then also our people are paying high prices for food & farmers are going for suicide not getting good price for produce.
i Differ here with author's view point of big retailers dictating terms by contract farming, working with only big farmers,pushing farmers to use extensive chemicals,comparing 100% fdi in agriculture.farmers & consumers will get benefited in lot of ways
1.Retailers will setup cold chains for which GOVT doesn't have huge money & will store food with timely availability of all over year across country.consumers will benefit for less fluctuation in prices & farmers timely sale of crop at market rate or better than it if its contract farming.
2.Govt will get revenue through various taxes if any of these retailer decide to source for global operations,Farmers will get access to new
crops,techniques, international prices if they voluntarily go for contract farming,Retailer will benefit by continue supply of food at a lower rate assuming we improve our production when our manpower cost is one of the lowest.
3.Small farmers will also benefit as it depend on kind of crop they grow.In India small farmers
usually go for fruits & vegetables as they can earn more from less land holding while large farmers go for food grains.They will get to International market through this retailers getting them good prices & techniques which will pollute less our resources as this retailer will ensure farmers comply with international food standards thus benefiting us even in getting quality food.
there are lot more benefits to be count.our past experience of telecom has important lesson for us that free market benefits consumers,producers,govt..........i believe same would be happening with INDIAN agriculture after retailer & farmers are allowed to co produce so that we can pridefully again say"jai jawan jai kissan"
I would rather differ with Rajchahal as I found this article quite insightful and I the reasons as to why I differ with the comment that followed this article is as thus.
ReplyDelete* As if Walmart and Tesco care for the farmer? We don't need to have great business acumen to understand that their business model is about procuring at the lowest price and selling at the highest.
* FDI in retailing can upset import balance. Large international retailer prefer to source majority of their products globally. Global retailers resort to predatory pricing. Due to financial clout they often sell below cost in new markets.
* Once the domestic players are wiped out of the market, foreign players enjoy a monopoly position which allows them to increase prices and earn profits thereby contradicting that FDI would decrease inflation.
* There are other mechanisms like Producer Price Index(PPI) that would really benefit inflation
* The organizational form of rural producers as they interact with big retail is still not being done. Small farmers can undertake contract farming, but they have no bargaining power and will be at the mercy of the buyers. Small farmers would have to form cooperatives to deal with big retailers
* In US organized retail sector has pushed down the prices of the farmers and killed small time shopkeepers.
* Read what impact walmart did to Mexico and it's agriculture sector which is not very likeable.
Dear Bhaviyasharma
ReplyDeletei am happy that you differ but the reason that you have given are not all valid for supporting the argument , i will try to elaborate this..
* Its true Tesco & Walmart doesn't care for farmers but neither do middle men,addtiyas(brokers) sitting in mandis
, in fact every bushiness try to maximize its profit so do these companies but since are big brands with large reputations they wont be risking it by playing wrong
in much sought after virgin retail market like India.
*There will be improvement in fiscal deficit as this retailers would be sourcing from India for global
operations provided we can support their scale of sourcing as many crops specially go waste due to non-processing & lack of storage facilities.i hope india can able to become one of the largest exporter of agro-processed food as of now it is going waste neither helping farmers in accessing global markets nor govt earning revenue.
* As far as domestic players are concern govt cant protect them forever by protecting them from foreign competition in this order globalized world where India want to be economic superpower but don't want to compete .Increase in competition will definitely bring in better products & service opening wider choices for Indian customers like what happened in automobile sector.Had we been not able to open this sector for competition we would have been travelling in Ambassadors & Maruti 800's.
Does coming of Hyundai wiped Maruti,no it has pushed Maruti to innovate,launch new products & designs fast,give customers more features in same prices,inspired Tata to innovate 1 million wonder car"nano" & we gave world a new term "frugal Engineering to ponder upon".you may be wondering about my foolish attempts of drawing analogies of auto with retail but see customers are same they want innovative products,value,design, services that's only possible when their is cut throat competition in which only fittest will survive & i believe domestic retailers,kirana walas will only survive provided they adapt fast & good thing about them is they already Understand INDIA much better than those foreign retailers..
Interview with Managing Director, GCMMF, R S Sodhi
ReplyDeleteKalpesh Damor & Vinay Umarji / Ahmedabad Sep 07, 2012, 00:56 (Business Standard)
Can you sustain against the opening up of FDI [foreign direct investment] in retail?
Yes absolutely. Ours is an open economy. This will definitely open up competition. But don’t say the opening up of FDI in retail will benefit farmers. Don’t say “we are allowing FDI for the benefit of farmers”. Don’t give that excuse. Experience says farmers in countries where the sector was opened earlier have not benefited. Anyway, Indian supply chain works at a very low margin, which will be difficult for them [multinationals].